Saturday, September 12, 2009

Was the American War for Independence Biblically Justified and Lawful?

I have recently been in a discussion about the legality of the American War for Independence, specifically whether the Colonists and Founders violated God's Law in warring against the king's invading armies. For some helpful insights, I am posting the following excerpt from The United States: A Christian Republic, by R.J. Rushdoony:
The American colonies were all Christian republics. They were, first of all, free and independent states, self-governing republics. There were never a part of England, whatever the school textbooks may say. Each colony began its existence with a charter or constitution, created by its own governmental bodies, and had no relationship to the mother country, England, except that they shared a king in common, and the king was a feudal, contractual monarch over the colonies.

There were mutual obligations between king and people. The royal governor represented the king, the freely elected legislators represented the people. Each colony could issue its own money, an obvious sign of an independent country. The trouble between king and people came in two ways. First, the English kings claimed divine rights and the absolute power of rule, and, after 1688, the English Parliament claimed this right for itself. After the French and Indian War, Parliament, a foreign government, took over the king's power in America, and then it tried to usurp the powers of the American legislatures and the American peoples. Parliament had no legal relationship to the Colonies except in imperial matters, none with respect to the internal affairs of these American states.

Parliament invaded the American colonies in three ways: first, it tried to take over their internal affairs by taxing and governing them; second, it quartered troops on them when they resisted this invasion; third, it declared war on them and a full-scale invasion of America. The American states then declared their independence of King George III for violating his contractual kingship. They did not declare their independence of Parliament because they had never been subjects of the English Parliament or of England. The Declaration of Independence was directed against King George III and cited the reasons why his relationship to America had been rendered null and void by his own actions. The Declaration plainly stated: "these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be FREE and INDEPENDENT STATES." Thus, the American states asserted that their independence dated from their first settlement: they had never been subjects of England; they had been his majesty's loyal subjects until King George himself destroyed the constitution and rendered it null and void.

All of the American colonies being Christian republics bring us to the other great reason for the War of Independence, a war to maintain independence against invasion. John Adams declared that, "as much as any other cause," the American resistance to Parliament was aroused by the projected attempt of Parliament to force bishops onto the colonies. Adams wrote in a letter to Dr. Jedediah Morse, December 2, 1815, that, "The objection was not merely to the office of a bishop, though even that was dreaded, but to the authority of Parliament, on which it must be founded" (John Adams, Works, vol. 10, 1865 edition, 185). Each American state had its own religious settlement; none of them wanted an outside government to force a religious establishment on them. They wanted the freedom to be Christian republics according to their own Biblical beliefs. Every state, when the Constitution was adopted, was a Christian republic. Nine of the thirteen had one or more established churches. Christianity as a religion, rather than a particular church, was the established faith of the other states.
In Rushdoony's This Independent Republic he deals further and much deeper with legality, interposition, the Founders' view of covenantal civil government, and more. Especially insightful is his analysis of the antithesis between the American "conservative counter-revolution" grounded in a biblical understanding, as against the Enlightenment-grounded French Revolution. I highly recommend This Independent Republic, especially chapters 3 and 10.

5 Comments:

At 9/12/2009 6:57 AM , Blogger Jkplayschess said...

Very helpful. Thanks.

 
At 9/12/2009 10:12 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

While that is interesting, there is no point in living in the past. Wouldn't it be more helpful to analyze wether or not the current wars America is fighting, Afghanistan and Iraq, are Biblical?

Even if you don't, I would like to know your opinion on those wars.

 
At 9/12/2009 12:28 PM , Blogger C.S. Hayden said...

You're welcome, Jason!

Anon: I submit that these issues are very relevant for us today. We cannot take for granted that the Founders were right or wrong. Our views have to be grounded in sound theology and a proper understanding of history. If we don't understand our past, our Fathers, the glories and errors of yesteryear, how can we live in the present? History teaches us to hope, as Robert E. Lee said, and Romans 15 and I Corinthians 10 (among other passages, including many Psalms) tell us that we can learn from the examples history.

I don't know whether it is more or less helpful to analyze the current "wars," but I would hold to the Christian "just war theory" that I have blogged about within the last couple of weeks. I don't believe the stated motives for the current "wars" were right -- building secular democratic nation-states in the Middle East, enforcing U.N. resolutions, etc. I don't think Congress ever properly declared war, as required by the Constitution. And I don't want to get into conspiracy theory, but I believe there is much more behind the motives for the current "wars" than the neo-con talk show hosts want us to believe. I know that's a brief answer, but that should give you a taste of my view.

 
At 9/16/2009 10:08 AM , Anonymous Brad Pierce said...

Caleb, thanks for the post and the reference to Rushdoony's book. I am current leading a young man in a study of the doctrines of covenant and civil government and how they relate to the American War for Independence, the Texas War for Independence, and the Southern War for Independence.

Rushdoony's book looks like exactly what I need, especially related to the American War for Independence.

Thanks!

 
At 9/18/2009 7:43 AM , Blogger C.S. Hayden said...

That sounds like a great study, Brad. I'm glad this post was helpful for you!

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home